Problems viewing this email? Click Here

600px_FCS-IntelligenceTopper-New
September 10, 2015  

 
 Q&A of the Week

Feral Cats as Domestic Animals

An Ohio subscriber recently asked the following question:

The insured's landlord's package policy excludes damage from "insects, rodents, birds, or domestic animals." During the course of a tenant move-out/move-in, three feral cats entered the home. They could not be trapped initially and did significant damage prior to being removed. The company has stipulated the cats were not the pets of either tenant and were in fact feral. The company has denied the claim, asserting that whether an animal is "domestic" depends upon the species. The insured asserts it depends on the behavior of the animal, and feral, wild cats cannot be considered domestic. Based on staff experience unrelated to insurance, we know feral cats enjoy the same protections under our animal cruelty statutes as pet cats, and for criminal law they are considered "domestic" regardless of their disposition. Insurance law frequently diverging, we would like your thoughts on the company's denial.

ANSWER: Absent a definition in the policy, we look to the common dictionary meaning of "domestic animal": "any of various animals (as the horse or sheep) domesticated so as to live and breed in a tame condition" (Merriam-Webster Online), and "an animal, as the horse or cat, that has been tamed and kept by humans as a work animal, food source, or pet, especially a member of those species that have, through selective breeding, become notably different from their wild ancestors" (dictionary.com). These definitions leave feral cats out as they are not pets or tame, even if they are protected by animal cruelty statutes. So, the exclusion would not apply.

 
 Litigation Watch
Malicious Prosecution and Occurrence

Before the court in this instance was a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Selective Insurance Company and a motion for summary judgment filed by RLI Insurance Company. This case is Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast v. RLI Insurance Company, 2015 WL 4250364.

The coverage dispute arose from the wrongful conviction of Clarence Elkins. He was later exonerated and then sued the city of Barberton and its police officers for malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium. During the time period relevant to this matter, Barberton had excess insurance policies through Selective and RLI. The RLI policy had a policy period from June 29, 1997 to June 29, 1998. The Selective policy had a policy period from June 29, 1998 to June 29, 1999.

The claim was settled, with Selective contributing to the settlement but RLI denying any coverage. RLI argued that the malicious prosecution claim by Elkins did not occur during RLI's policy period. Selective, having been assigned Barberton's rights under the policy, brought this lawsuit seeking contribution from RLI.

The United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division, noted that the question before it was whether under Ohio law and in light of the relevant language of the insurance policies, the malicious prosecution of Elkins occurred for the purposes of insurance coverage at the time charges were filed or at some other time. Selective claimed that the malicious prosecution occurred when the charges were filed against Elkins on June 11, 1998. RLI countered that the malicious prosecution occurred at the time the police failed to disclose a memo that could have supported Elkins' claim of innocence; this happened no earlier than January 6, 1999. If Selective was correct, the occurrence would fall within the policy period provided by the RLI policy; if RLI was correct, because the memo was not created until six months after the RLI policy terminated, RLI's policy was not applicable.

The court found that the RLI policy had to pay when the insured (Barberton) became legally obligated to pay because of personal injury caused by an occurrence. In this case, Barberton became legally obligated to pay when it agreed to settle the case. The occurrence was the pattern of misconduct that occurred while the RLI policy was in effect. Therefore, the court decided that the malicious prosecution of Elkins occurred for coverage purposes when criminal charges were filed.

The court found that the majority or courts around the country have determined that coverage for a malicious prosecution claim is triggered at the time the underlying criminal charges are filed. A minority of courts have adopted the rule that malicious prosecution occurs for coverage purposes at the time the underlying criminal charges are resolved in favor of the defendant. As an example of the majority opinion, the court quoted the Eighth Circuit observation that "the time of occurrence is when the claimant sustains damages, not when the act or omission causing the damage takes place". Moreover, Ohio case law said that, when determining whether something constitutes an occurrence under the insurance policy, the focus should be on the injury and its immediate attendant causative circumstances.

The court concluded that the injury to Elkins began the day of his arrest, when criminal charges were filed. Thus, Selective's motion for partial summary judgment was granted and RLI's motion for summary judgment was denied.

Editor's Note: The U.S. District Court follows the majority judicial opinion in determining that coverage for a malicious prosecution claim is triggered at the time the underlying criminal charges are filed.
 
   
 Subscribe to FC&S
FC&S Online is the unquestioned authority on insurance coverage interpretation and anlaysis for the P&C industry. FC&S offers unbiased analysis and interpretation and keeps you current on the latest ISO and AAIS revisions. Providing instant access to the very latest information, FC&S is the resource that agents, attorneys, brokers, risk managers, underwriters, and adjusters rely on to research commercial and personal lines coverage issues.
Quickly and accurately determine coverage under a policy at the time of loss
Research coverage issues and interpretations, including court cases
Access experts live to discuss specific situations
Find answers to questions based on real-world claims disputes
View and print ISO forms
Access updates on breaking litigation and bureau developments
160px_Start-Your-Free-Trial
 
 Join Us Live!
FC&S editors regularly conduct web-based demos of the service. Feel free to contact Christine Barlow, cbarlow@alm.com, for more information. They only take 30 minutes, a small investment of time that will help you learn all that FC&S Online has to offer.
 
 Contact Us
As always, your comments and questions are welcome.

Contact us at:
FC&S Department
Phone: 800-543-0874
Fax: 859-692-2246
Email: eAlerts@nuco.com
 
The Zalma Insurance Claims Library
293px_FCS_ZalmaComboImage  
Insurance Claims: A Comprehensive Guide
The only source you'll need to successfully handle insurance claims from start to finish. More Info
Construction Defects Coverage Guide
Your single-source for identifying, insuring, investigating, prosecuting, and defending cases that result from construction defect claims. More Info
Mold Claims Coverage Guide
This guide will allow you to handle mold insurance claims and litigation resulting from mold or fungi related disputes with confidence. More Info
For more information about these titles Click Here
 
FC&S Team
Kelly Maheu, J.D.
Publisher
  Diane W. Richardson, CPCU
Consulting Editor
Christine G. Barlow, CPCU
Managing Editor, FC&S
  Diana B. Reitz, CPCU, AAI
Consulting Editor
David D. Thamann, J.D., CPCU, ARM
Managing Editor, FC&S Bulletins
  Emily Brunner
Online Print/Production Editor
Susan L. Massmann, CPCU
Managing Editor, Electronic Publications
  Tosha Brinkman
Marketing Manager
Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE
Contributing Editor
  Donna Cozatchy
Creative Director

 
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional service. If legal advice is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.

To ensure future delivery of email, please add admin@list.nationalunderwriter.com
to your address book, contacts or safe sender list.
You have received this email at %%merge members_.emailaddr_%%.
Click here to unsubscribe from %%merge list.descshort%%
Copyright ©2015 The National Underwriter Company, A Division of ALM Media LLC.
All rights reserved.
 
120px_ALM_NT_CMYK_Small
4157 Olympic Blvd., Suite 225
Erlanger, KY 41018
1-800-543-0874